DefiLlama and DappRadar listing support for Web3 projects

What does a DefiLlama and DappRadar listing cover?

This service coordinates two distinct listing workstreams: TVL information for DefiLlama and a dApp listing for DappRadar. The aim is a coherent, well-supported presentation of your project, not simply a collection of links submitted without review.

DefiLlama is relevant when users need to find and assess a protocol’s TVL information. DappRadar is relevant when your product is a dApp that should have a clear public profile. The work can cover both platforms together, or focus on the one that fits your project and available evidence. We first confirm that the project type and information you can substantiate suit the requested listing.

The combined route is useful when the protocol and its dApp are closely connected, but the two profiles still need platform-specific details. A name, chain, product description or official URL should not drift between submissions. For a broader overview of listing work, see Listings and verification. If your priority is another tracker, listings on other crypto trackers can help frame the options.

What should you prepare before submitting TVL and dApp details?

A strong submission starts with information your team can verify and keep current. Before drafting, MediaStrategy runs a kickoff checklist to identify the project’s public sources, responsible contact and any gaps that could slow a review.

Prepare a shared folder or source document with:

• The project’s official name, website and concise description.
• Relevant chain and protocol details, with the public pages that support them.
• TVL-related information and the sources your team uses to explain it.
• The dApp’s official access point, product category and user-facing explanation.
• Official social or community links, if they are part of the project’s public identity.
• A named team contact who can confirm details and respond to platform questions.

Separate confirmed facts from information that is still changing. If a figure or product description is not ready to publish, flag it rather than filling the gap with an estimate. We compare the submitted details with the project’s own public materials and return a short gap list for approval. This makes review more useful: the team can address missing evidence and conflicting descriptions before the submission is sent.

How do DefiLlama and DappRadar submissions differ?

The two submissions should tell a consistent project story while answering different user questions. For DefiLlama, the preparation centers on the protocol and its TVL information; for DappRadar, it centers on the dApp and the details a user needs to recognize and access it.

We do not treat one completed profile as proof that the other is ready. For each, we review whether the submitted name, description and links match the project’s own public presence. The project team approves the final wording and source materials before submission. This is especially important where a protocol has multiple products, chain deployments or a recently updated brand: choose the exact product scope and official destination first, then align the supporting details around it.

If your project also needs a market-facing exchange profile, that is a separate decision from these tracker submissions; see centralized exchange listing.

What does MediaStrategy handle during the listing work?

MediaStrategy provides a managed submission process, with a senior reviewer responsible for scope, materials and follow-up. You retain control of project facts and approvals; our role is to make the information organized, consistent and ready to present.

The project receives a defined set of working outputs:

• A readiness review for the requested DefiLlama and DappRadar workstreams.
• A tailored checklist of information and public evidence to supply.
• Draft profile details for your team to verify before submission.
• Submission coordination and a record of submitted materials.
• Follow-up handling and status notes when the platforms respond or request clarification.

At kickoff, we agree who can approve copy and answer product or data questions. One point of contact on your side keeps revisions from splitting across teams. Our reporting format is a concise status note: completed work, open questions, next action and owner. This gives founders and operators a useful view of progress without burying the decision-makers in message history. The scope is confirmed before work begins, so you know which profiles, materials and coordination tasks are included.

What can affect a DefiLlama or DappRadar listing?

The main operational risk is a gap between the project’s submitted information and what its public sources can support. DefiLlama controls whether and how TVL information is reviewed or displayed, while DappRadar controls dApp profile acceptance and presentation; neither outcome or timing is in our control. We commit to the agreed preparation, submission and follow-up work, not to a platform decision or a particular placement.

To reduce avoidable friction, we check that the team can explain the project’s identity, data sources and product destination consistently before submission. We flag unclear ownership, broken public links and descriptions that combine several products without distinguishing them. If information changes while a review is underway, we ask the project contact to confirm the revised details before we update the submission.

Keep a record of which source is authoritative for each fact and tell us promptly if a contract, product name or official URL changes. That gives the team a controlled way to respond to questions and prevents an old description from being reused in a later update. For a separate on-chain profile or market setup, consider DEX listing and liquidity setup.

How should these listings fit into your wider launch plan?

Treat tracker submissions as one part of a credible public information layer, not as a substitute for product readiness or user communication. The best time to prepare is when the project can explain what it does, point to its official product and support its public data with sources the team is comfortable sharing.

A practical sequence is to confirm project identity and ownership, assemble the evidence, review each profile separately, then coordinate submissions and follow-up. If exchange discovery is also on the roadmap, separate that workstream and its requirements from tracker profile preparation. The CoinMarketCap listing and CoinGecko listing pages cover those distinct platform processes. For a broader scope discussion, start at Contact.

Before kickoff, send your official website, the DefiLlama and DappRadar profiles or submission context if available, the relevant public data sources, and the name of the person who can approve details. MediaStrategy will review the materials, identify the open questions and return a scoped plan for the requested listing work.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Confirm the listing scopeWe clarify whether you need DefiLlama TVL preparation, a DappRadar dApp profile or both. We also confirm the project contact and what the team can substantiate.
2. Collect and check the materialsYou share the official project details and relevant public sources. Our reviewer checks consistency and sends back a focused gap list for your team.
3. Approve platform-specific detailsWe prepare the information for each workstream separately, then ask your authorized contact to confirm the final details before submission.
4. Submit and report follow-upWe coordinate the agreed submissions, track responses and provide concise status notes with the next action and its owner.